Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perloff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Toward Congenial Environments for Knowledge Utilization in Today's University

Robert Perloff

Graduate School of Business University of Pittsburgh

Among the myriad discussions in which Howard Davis and I engaged, the most animated and provocative—yet agonizingly frustrating—ones were centered around a topic that conunuously plagued him, a problem, the searchfor a solution of which he sought, in vain, until the end of his days. I refer to Howie's passionate desire to come up with a plan whereby the science and practice of knowledge utilization might find a respected and enduring home in the groves of academe. Howie—what an unsuitable nickname, implying diminutiveness, for such a physically and intellectually towering personage—was bedeviled by the painful reality that unless scholars and professionals found a sympathetic home in academia, the field of knowledge utilization would never be quite whole, and hence would probably never flourish, let alone survive. Any field of study built to last and grow and maintain a solid and esteemed footing in the family of learned disciplines and professions needs to have the approval of one's scientific, disciplinary, and professional brethren. It needs to be able to attract "hard money" support as an intellectual endeavor and to be nurtured institutionally through good times and bad. Any field of inquiry or application, the survival of which is dependent upon outside support and is not viewed as an area worthy of institutional support, will be destined to live in a precarious hand-to- mouth fashion and will, probably, vanish before very long. Howie Davis "commissioned" me to enter into a continuing dialogue with him about thisproblem. We never did get very far in a systematic way, although I daresay that I enjoyed to the hilt and benefited enormously from the opportunity to ruminate over this problem, enabling me to grow and exult in the world of ideas through these delightful intellectual odysseys with the incomparable Howard R. Davis.

Science Communication, Vol. 8, No. 2, 282-293 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/107554708600800212


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?