Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

A Preliminary Exploratory Study of Valuations Placed On the Perceived Goals and Benefits of Different Types of Research Endeavor

International Study Group On Potential Values and Benefits of Research

Inadequate communication of the potential value and benefits of research findings could be an important factor in failure of knowledge diffusion and utilization. This deficiency may be related to differences in belief systems and in the valuations placed upon different types of research goals. A preliminary exploratory and developmental study employed a constrained allocation method to examine the valuations of 12 different types of research goals by 559 persons in five countries. There was substantial variation between individuals and between different groups and countries, with a tendency toward extremism. The constrained allocation method appears to be a useful tool for investigating beliefs and judgments regarding the pertinence and importance of different research objectives. As discussed here in some detail, the findings have definite methodological implications; they also suggest hypotheses and indicate avenues jor further research.

Science Communication, Vol. 5, No. 1, 26-40 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/107554708300500102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?