This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sachsman, D. B. Articles by Valenti, J. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Regional Issues, National Norms

A Four-Region Analysis of U.S. Environment Reporters

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, david-sachsman{at}utc.edu

James Simon

Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut

JoAnn M. Valenti

Salt Lake City, Utah

Does a national norm exist for environment reporters, or do they differ by region? This study used a census approach to examine environmental journalists in four regions of the United States. Across all four regions, these reporters spent much of their time covering nonenvironment stories. They relied more often on local and state sources than on national sources and used a variety of story frames and angles to construct their reporting. In discussing barriers to reporting, they were more likely to cite such issues as time constraints or the size of the news hole rather than interference by editors or advertisers. Most felt the need to remain objective, rejecting calls for advocacy or a civic-journalism approach. The study found more similarities across the regions than differences, suggesting that there is a national norm for covering the environment.

Key Words: environment • reporters • journalists • risk • newspapers • television • communication

Science Communication, Vol. 28, No. 1, 93-121 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547006291344


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?