Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roche, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Muskavitch, M. A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Limited Precision in Print Media Communication of West Nile Virus Risks

John P. Roche

Marc A. T. Muskavitch

Boston College

The emergence of West Nile virus in the United States provides an opportunity to examine the effectiveness with which the print media communicate risks associated with a specific health threat. The authors surveyed articles on West Nile virus published in major North American newspapers in the year 2000 to assess the efficacy of risk communication related to this disease. They found that articles generally presented risk information with a low degree of contextual precision; that is, information was generally more qualitative than quantitative, and quantitative information that was present generally did not provide the relative context of a denominator. Therefore, the information provided was of limited usefulness to readers, in that it was insufficient to help readers make personal decisions required to reduce overall personal risk while minimizing personal cost. Their findings suggest that there is a distinct need for the media to provide more precise information about health risks.

Key Words: West Nile virus • encephalitis • infectious disease • risk communication • public education

Science Communication, Vol. 24, No. 3, 353-365 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547002250300
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
A. D. Dudo, M. F. Dahlstrom, and D. Brossard
Reporting a Potential Pandemic: A Risk-Related Assessment of Avian Influenza Coverage in U.S. Newspapers
Science Communication, June 1, 2007; 28(4): 429 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
M. Desilva, M. A. T. Muskavitch, and J. P. Roche
Print Media Coverage of Antibiotic Resistance
Science Communication, September 1, 2004; 26(1): 31 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
W. Evans
Bibliography
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 219 - 221.
[PDF]