Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sachsman, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Valenti, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Environment Reporters of New England

David B. Sachsman

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

James Simon

Fairfield University

Joann Myer Valenti

Brigham Young University

Who are the reporters covering environmental issues in the United States? As the first step in a nationwide series of regional studies of environment reporters conducted over time, the researchers identified and interviewed 55 environment reporters working for New England daily newspapers and television stations in winter and spring 2000. The study found environment reporters working at half the region's newspapers and only four of the television stations. The New England environment reporters ranked everyday, practical journalistic process concerns such as time constraints and the size of the news hole as the most frequent barriers to reporting on the environment. They also said their sources most often came from government, and their stories often contained a variety of factors, including a human-interest angle, a government angle, and a pollution angle. Many wished to aid the environment while still remaining objective in their reporting.

Science Communication, Vol. 23, No. 4, 410-441 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/107554700202300403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
K. Wilson
Television weathercasters as potentially prominent science communicators
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
D. B. Sachsman, J. Simon, and J. M. Valenti
Regional Issues, National Norms: A Four-Region Analysis of U.S. Environment Reporters
Science Communication, September 1, 2006; 28(1): 93 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. M. Valenti and G. Tavana
Report: Continuing Science Education for Environmental Journalists and Science Writers: In Situ With the Experts
Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 300 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]