This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PRIEST, S. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Misplaced Faith

Communication Variables as Predictors of Encouragement for Biotechnology Development

Texas A&M University

Science communicators and the broader scientific community often expect media information campaigns to mold attitudes about science and technology in predictable ways. But resistance to technology is not always based on ignorance, and the ability of media-based education to directly shape opinions is actually quite limited. This article uses data from a recent U.S. national survey on opinions about biotechnology to argue that trust in institutional actors is a bigger factor than genetic knowledge in predicting encouragement for specific applications of biotechnology. The results have implications for the practice of science, as well as for the practice of science communication.

Science Communication, Vol. 23, No. 2, 97-110 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547001023002002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Liu and S. Priest Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors Public Understanding of Science, November 1, 2009; 18(6): 704 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, E. Kim, and B. V. Lewenstein Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 546 - 558. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J.W. Bos, C. M. Koolstra, and J. T.J.M. Willems Adolescent responses toward a new technology: first associations, information seeking and affective responses to ecogenomics Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 243 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Ho, D. Brossard, and D. A. Scheufele Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2008; 20(2): 171 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Allum, P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi, and I. Brunton-Smith Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 35 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Brossard and M. C. Nisbet Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2007; 19(1): 24 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Henderson, C. K. Weaver, and G. Cheney Talking 'facts': identity and rationality in industry perspectives on genetic modification Discourse Studies, February 1, 2007; 9(1): 9 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Qin and J. L. Brown Consumer Opinions about Genetically Engineered Salmon and Information Effect on Opinions: A Qualitative Approach Science Communication, December 1, 2006; 28(2): 243 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. Priest The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: competing voices, contrasting frames Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 55 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gutteling, L. Hanssen, N. van der Veer, and E. Seydel Trust in governance and the acceptance of genetically modified food in the Netherlands Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 103 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C.-J. Lee, D. A. Scheufele, and B. V. Lewenstein Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Affect on Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 240 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Besley and J. Shanahan Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology Science Communication, June 1, 2005; 26(4): 347 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Wilson Forecasting the Future: How Television Weathercasters--Attitudes and Beliefs about Climate Change Affect Their Cognitive Knowledge on the Science Science Communication, December 1, 2002; 24(2): 246 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. BORCHELT Communicating the Future: Report of the Research Roadmap Panel for Public Communication of Science and Technology in the Twenty-First Century Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 194 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]