Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUNWOODY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

Studying Users of the Why Files

SHARON DUNWOODY

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Science Web sites proliferate, offering users a virtual avalanche of information that ranges widely across topic, message style, and quality of evidence. Users, too, are proliferating. But what kind of people visit these sites, how do they maneuver through the site once they arrive, and do they learn anything about science as a result of their visits? For the past five years, a team of researchers has been trying to answer these questions by focusing on one science Web site, the Why Files (http://whyfiles.news.wisc.edu). Originally created as part of the National Institute for Science Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the site has won industry kudos for its efforts to offer users "the science behind the news." Most importantly for this discussion, it has also served as a laboratory for examining the characteristics of Why Files users, for tracking their coping strategies on the site itself, and for experiments to assess science learning. This discussion will offer some of the results of that research.

Science Communication, Vol. 22, No. 3, 274-282 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547001022003004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
R. A. Yaros
Is It the Medium or the Message? Structuring Complex News to Enhance Engagement and Situational Understanding by Nonexperts
Communication Research, August 1, 2006; 33(4): 285 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
G. Rowe, W. Poortinga, and N. Pidgeon
A Comparison of Responses to Internet and Postal Surveys in a Public Engagement Context
Science Communication, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 352 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]