Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOGAN, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, N. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Science and Medical Coverage in the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post

A Six-Year Perspective

ROBERT A. LOGAN

University of Missouri

PENG ZENGJUN

Beijing Review

NANCY FRASER WILSON

Webster University

A content analysis of the science, medical, and environmental news reported in the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post in biennial periods from 1989 to 1995 explored seven hypotheses about science reporting, news selection, and writing that were derived from the qualitatively based literature. Outcome variables were the percentage of news stories that are generated by events or are episodically generated, of news stories that are generated by science issues, of news stories with an embedded human interest component, of news stories with an embedded educational/informative component, of conflicts between scientists embedded as a writing motif, of news stories with a focus on pioneer science, and of news stories with a focus on textbook science. Five of the seven hypotheses with regard to the overall frequencies of science-reporting motifs within both newspapers were rejected. Expected qualitative patterns received only partial and equivocal support within the time periods surveyed. The findings suggest that science journalism performance, if assessed over longer periods of time, may vary from some qualitative case-study presumptions. Case studies of science news may not reflect a news organization's overall reporting, editing, and news selection trends, which appear to be more broadly prudent and responsible within the newspapers surveyed than some previous scholarship suggests.

Science Communication, Vol. 22, No. 1, 5-26 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547000022001002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
M. Schmierbach
Method Matters: The Influence of Methodology on Journalists' Assessments of Social Science Research
Science Communication, March 1, 2005; 26(3): 269 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
R. A. Logan, J. Park, and J.-H. Shin
Elite Sources, Context, and News Topics: How Two Korean Newspapers Covered a Public Health Crisis
Science Communication, June 1, 2004; 25(4): 364 - 398.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
R. A. LOGAN
Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History
Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 135 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]