Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Commentary: To the Future— Arguments for Scientific Literacy

JANE MAIENSCHEIN AND STUDENTS: Arizona State University

Even while demanding improvements in science education because of a deplorable lack of scientific literacy, advocates do not agree about what they mean. "Scientific literacy" has become a buzz phrase to capture different things, a confusion that is useful at times because it allows people to think they agree when they really do not. Yet, hiding disagreements also keeps us from understanding how we might make things better. This commentary explores the most common meanings and distinguishes scientific literacy—or the democratic having of creative, scientific "habits of mind" by everybody—from science literacy—or the having of particular scientific knowledge by trained experts. Both are important, and we must not lose track of the more difficult and long-term goal of achieving scientific literacy for everybody in the urgency of producing short-term results in the form of scientific knowledge by the few.

Science Communication, Vol. 21, No. 1, 75-87 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547099021001003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
T. W. Burns, D. J. O'Connor, and S. M. Stocklmayer
Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 183 - 202.
[PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
D. Treise and M. F. Weigold
Advancing Science Communication: A Survey of Science Communicators
Science Communication, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 310 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
S. H. PRIEST
Misplaced Faith: Communication Variables as Predictors of Encouragement for Biotechnology Development
Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 97 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
M. F. WEIGOLD
Communicating Science: A Review of the Literature
Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 164 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
F. CLARK and D. L. ILLMAN
Dimensions of Civic Science: Introductory Essay
Science Communication, September 1, 2001; 23(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]