This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GUNTER, B. Articles by BEYLEVELD, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Media and Public Understanding of Biotechnology

A Survey of Scientists and Journalists

University of Sheffield

JULIAN KINDERLERER

University of Sheffield

DERYCK BEYLEVELD

University of Sheffield

An exploratory survey was conducted to investigate the perceptions and opinions of two important "expert" groups—scientists and journalists. Scientists working in the biotechnology field and journalists who had written or broadcast about it were regarded as key players in the communication of information about scientific developments to the lay population. This research showed that both groups agreed that the media have an important part to play in informing the public about biotechnology. Scientists were more likely than journalists to perceive coverage as too sensational and dramatic, too speculative, with too much emphasis on risks. Scientists did not exhibit much trust in journalists, even though journalists were as likely as scientists to agree that media reporting of biotechnology should be sober, balanced, and focused on the facts. Both groups also agreed that journalists need to ensure they are technically prepared when reporting on complex science issues. Scientists probably needed more media training and support from their own professional culture to facilitate more effective relations with media professionals and the public.

Science Communication, Vol. 20, No. 4, 373-394 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547099020004002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Petersen, A. Anderson, S. Allan, and C. Wilkinson Opening the black box: scientists' views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 512 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Schafer From Public Understanding to Public Engagement: An Empirical Assessment of Changes in Science Coverage Science Communication, June 1, 2009; 30(4): 475 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Maeseele and D. Schuurman Biotechnology and the Popular Press in Northern Belgium: A Case Study of Hegemonic Media Discourses and the Interpretive Struggle Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 435 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Besley and J. Shanahan Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology Science Communication, June 1, 2005; 26(4): 347 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Horst Cloning sensations: mass mediated articulation of social responses to controversial biotechnology Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 185 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Hijmans, A. Pleijter, and F. Wester Covering Scientific Research in Dutch Newspapers Science Communication, December 1, 2003; 25(2): 153 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]