Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOGAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Toward a Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Model of Health Care Research Use

JO LOGAN

University of Ottawa

IAN D. GRAHAM

Ottawa Civic Hospital Loeb Research Institute

Numerous health care disciplines have noted that insufficient research evidence is used in clinical practice. This situation denies optimal care to patients and potentially increases system costs. A practical theoretical framework for policymakers intent on promoting an evidence-based approach to the transfer and use of research findings in clinical practice settings is presented. The Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) has a comprehensive interdisciplinary focus and consists of six key elements: the practice environment, potential adopters of the evidence, the evidence-based innovation, research transfer strategies, the evidence adoption, and health-related and other outcomes. Model elements and the interactive relationships among them are described.

Science Communication, Vol. 20, No. 2, 227-246 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547098020002004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
S. D. Scott, C. A. Estabrooks, M. Allen, and C. Pollock
A Context of Uncertainty: How Context Shapes Nurses' Research Utilization Behaviors
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 347 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
N. Jacobson
Social Epistemology: Theory for the "Fourth Wave" of Knowledge Transfer and Exchange Research
Science Communication, September 1, 2007; 29(1): 116 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
C. Feifer, S. M. Ornstein, R. G. Jenkins, A. Wessell, S. T. Corley, L. S. Nemeth, L. Roylance, P. J. Nietert, and H. Liszka
The Logic Behind a Multimethod Intervention to Improve Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in a Nationwide Network of Primary Care Practices
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2006; 29(1): 65 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
Philadelphia Panel Members, Clinical Specialty Experts, J. Albright, R. Allman, R. P. Bonfiglio, A. Conill, B. Dobkin, A. A Guccione, S. Hasson, R. Russo, et al.
Philadelphia Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions: Overview and Methodology
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2001; 81(10): 1629 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
F. A. McAlister, N. R.C. Campbell, K. Zarnke, M. Levine, and I. D. Graham
The management of hypertension in Canada: a review of current guidelines, their shortcomings and implications for the future
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2001; 164(4): 517 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]