Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRIFFIN, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by DUNWOODY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Community Structure and Science Framing of News About Local Environmental Risks

ROBERT J. GRIFFIN

Marquette University

SHARON DUNWOODY

University of Wisconsin-Madison

When newspapers cover stories about environmental pollution, the nature of the community they serve can indirectly influence the contents of that coverage. This article describes research showing that newspapers in pluralistic (i.e., usually larger) communities are more likely than papers in homogeneous (i.e., usually smaller) communities to interpret the pollution as a science story. Framing a pollution incident as a science story makes it more likely that the story will link the pollution to health effects, especially when (1) newspapers in pluralistic communities are dealing with a local polluter, and (2) newspapers in homogeneous communities are writing about pollution problems outside the community. These results are consistent with the Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien conflict/consensus model, which posits that the way power is distributed in a community affects the way that stories are selected and framed by local mass media.

Science Communication, Vol. 18, No. 4, 362-384 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547097018004005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
C. E. Clarke
A Question of Balance: The Autism-Vaccine Controversy in the British and American Elite Press
Science Communication, September 1, 2008; 30(1): 77 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
J. R. Goodman and B. P. Goodman
Beneficial or biohazard? How the media frame biosolids
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 359 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
L. Kahlor, S. Dunwoody, and R. J. Griffin
Predicting Knowledge Complexity in the Wake of an Environmental Risk
Science Communication, September 1, 2004; 26(1): 5 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
L. Kahlor, S. Dunwoody, and R. J. Griffin
Attributions in explanations of risk estimates
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2002; 11(3): 243 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]