Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OIGENBLICK, L.
Right arrow Articles by HAREL, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fundamental Reorganization in Scientific Administration

The Khozraschet Initiative in Russian Applied Science

LUYDMILLA OIGENBLICK

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

ALBERT I. GOLDBERG

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

GEDALIAHU HAREL

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

The system of science in the former Soviet Union was based on a command administration that centralized decision making at government ministries. In 1987, the government introduced the new system of khozraschet, or accountability, granting a greater degree of administrative freedom to research institutes but obligating them to take responsibility for financing their activities. In a 1991 survey, scientists at three Moscow research and development institutes expressed a high degree of support for the administrative changes. The study of the three institutes revealed that major structural alterations had already taken place. By the beginning of 1996, many of the expectations for improved conditions had not been fulfilled, as a high degree of instability became evident in the Russian scientific system. The Russian example demonstrates the need for balance in institutional arrangements to advance science: change must provide solutions to all system problems or else substantial damage can be done to the scientific enterprise.

Science Communication, Vol. 18, No. 2, 131-152 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547096018002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?