Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VALENTE, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Origins and Development of the Diffusion of Innovations Paradigm as an Example of Scientific Growth

THOMAS W. VALENTE

Johns Hopkins University

EVERETT M. ROGERS

University of New Mexico

This article traces the emergence of the basic paradigm for early diffusion research created by two rural sociologists at Iowa State University, Bryce Ryan and Neal C. Gross. The diffusion paradigm spread to an invisible college of midwestern rural sociological researchers in the 1950s and 1960s, and then to a larger, interdisciplinary field of diffusion scholars. By the late 1960s, rural sociologists lost interest in diffusion studies, not because it was ineffective scientifically, but because of lack of support for such study as a consequence of farm overproduction and because most of the interesting research questions were thought to be answered.

Science Communication, Vol. 16, No. 3, 242-273 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1075547095016003002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiogenesHome page
M. W. Bauer
Social Influence by Artefacts
Diogenes, February 1, 2008; 55(1): 68 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
D. M. Kramer and D. C. Cole
Sustained, Intensive Engagement to Promote Health and Safety Knowledge Transfer to and Utilization by Workplaces
Science Communication, September 1, 2003; 25(1): 56 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
C. A. PERRY and R. E. RICE
Network Influences on Involvement in the Hybrid Problem Area of Developmental Dyslexia
Science Communication, September 1, 1999; 21(1): 38 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
L.-E. DATTA
The Message in the Bottle and the Genie in the Lamp: Information Integrity and Individualization in Science Communication
Science Communication, September 1, 1998; 20(1): 22 - 27.
[Abstract]