Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Influence of the Public on a Scientific Revolution

The Case Of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Geoff Gregory

Department of Scientific and Industrial Research New Zealand Geological Survey

The course of research into sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is traced. In the early 1970s there was a revolution in the underlying philosophy of the research community working on SIDS. This coincided with both a marked change in composition of this community and a large injection of funds for research resulting from political action by public pressure groups of SIDS parents. Reciprocal influences of knowledge creation and diffusion, on the one hand, and public communication and political action, on the other, are described. It is concluded that this scientific revolution was greatly influenced by pressure from the public. Researchers and public were carried along by shared optimism about the usefulness of breathing momtors in their research and as a SIDS preventive, respectively. However, subsequent research doubts about the relevance of monitors to SIDS have not been so readily accepted by the public but have tended to make researchers cautious over further public comment while not destroying their faith in a respiratory pathway for SIDS.

Science Communication, Vol. 11, No. 3, 248-267 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/107554709001100303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?